Review: Reverend Signature Mike Watt Wattplower Bass

We check out this kickass, aggressive, short-scale bass that totally delivers.

We check out this kickass, aggressive, short-scale bass that totally delivers.

I gotta be straight up โ€” Iโ€™m not the biggest fan of signature basses. I often find that these instruments have been tweaked aesthetically or electronically so much toward one individualโ€™s preference, they are a bit useless in most contexts. Take the Gene Simmons Axe bass, for example. Unless youโ€™re going onstage with your fellow face-painted rock & roll warriors spewing blood and fire, youโ€™ll just look and sound out of place (but, hey, youโ€™re ready to chop wood when the gig ends). Iโ€™ve also seen signature basses that are far too expensive for anyone but a collector; I once reviewed a signature bass that cost over $14,000. Over the years, however, Iโ€™ve found some notable exceptions. For example, I am a proud owner of a 1995 Fender Roscoe Beck V, which I will never part with, and the Sire Marcus Miller basses are amazing as well. Both of these examples follow my three key rules when it comes to designing signature basses: make the instrument friendly to a wide variety of styles, donโ€™t go overboard on the โ€œsignatureโ€ part regarding looks, and keep it affordable to players on a modest budget. Reverendโ€™s Mike Watt Signature bass, the Wattplower, delivers in two of these areas (subtle signature looks and affordability), but, in this case, I donโ€™t mind that it has a specific tone, since its aggressive sound casts a wide-enough net within rock genres.

If you arenโ€™t familiar with Mike Watt, stop reading and spend a good hour on Spotify familiarizing yourself with his music. Start with the Minutemen records, visit some Firehose and the Stooges, and then dig into Mikeโ€™s solo works โ€” he is one prolific player. Once youโ€™ve done that, come back and read on.

When I first went play the bass, I noticed that due to the instrumentโ€™s shape, the shoulder strap has to connect to the back of the neck joint. Usually I donโ€™t dig this type of setup, as it often makes the bass feel imbalanced, but that didnโ€™t occur here. Everything felt perfectly balanced. If you havenโ€™t played a short-scale instrument, you might think that the shorter neck makes it feel weird, but I havenโ€™t found that to be the case. I own a Danelectro โ€™58 Longhorn reissue, and I never feel awkward when switching between it and my Fender basses. Itโ€™s different, for sure, but not difficult to adjust to at all. The same was true with the Mike Watt bass โ€” I took right to it.

The distinctive tone of this instrument definitely pays tribute to Mikeโ€™s sound and approach; itโ€™s got growl for miles. No matter how I set the tone knob or where I played in relationship to the pickups, the growl spoke loudly and with attitude. Thatโ€™s by design, for sure. Youโ€™ve got a volume and tone knob, and thatโ€™s it. Someone wanting something more subtle or versatile in tone might be unhappy โ€” but then who would be considering this bass who wasnโ€™t into the ethos of its signature artist and the genre in which he performs? As such, I loved it. It begs you to play certain styles of music over others, which was just fine with me. I tried it out on some punk tunes, but I also found it fit well within one of my favorite genres of all time: โ€™90s grunge.

The Reverendโ€™s pickups are custom, and they sound like it. I discovered that the sweet spot for me was directly over the pickup, as this gave me an even blend of a bass-forward, deep-throated tone combined with an articulation that would cut through the most guitar-heavy of mixes. If I played back by the bridge, like I do on my Jazz Basses, the tone was too lightweight; too much in front of the pickup resulted in a loss of that aggressive articulation I was digging. Through it all, the bass growled no matter the position, whether I played with fingers or with a pick.

The bass proved so inspiring to play, I kept it out for a number of days and continued to try it out in various genres. Again, itโ€™s not ideal for more mellow tunes without some thoughtful amp adjustments, but I didnโ€™t mind that. In the end, the bass seemed well suited for gigs that demand an in-your-face aggressive tone on the low end. Also, when playing it, I easily forgot it was a short-scale instrument. Thatโ€™s how a short-scale bass should be: I donโ€™t want to be constantly thinking about its scale length.

The best compliment I can give this instrument is that when I put it back in its case (which is also custom and quite lovely) for shipping back to Reverend, I was a bit sad. While I have a host of nice basses, I have nothing like this, and thatโ€™s saying something. Like all well-designed instruments, this one inspires you to explore and test its character through the music you enjoy. So, if you play rock of any style, I encourage you to find a Mike Watt signature Reverend bass in a store near you and explore until you find some new paths in your music.

Pros Well balanced, lightweight, beautiful design; awesome bottom-heavy, growling tone

Cons Some might object that it does not offer a wide variety of tones, but, as I point out below, that is not negative in this context

Bottom Line A kickass, aggressive, short-scale bass that totally delivers.

SPECS

Body Solid, korina

Neck Three-piece korina, medium oval shape, bolt-on

Scale length 30″

Pickups One P-style, passive

Fingerboard Blackwood Tek

Fingerboard radius 12″

Frets 21, medium-jumbo

Nut width 1.65″ (42mm)

Controls Volume, tone

Bridge Hipshot

Tuners Hipshot Ultralight

Case Hardshell

Street $1,400

Contact reverendguitars.com

Already a subscriber? Log in here.

This story is free for you

Create a free account and get more of the Bass Magazine's top stories directly to your inbox.

Or, subscribe for unlimited access
Rod Taylor   By: Rod Taylor